Transmutation of the Sexual Substance.

In my previous two posts I considered the matter of my bipolarity and psychosis and how transmutation of my sexual substance helped me with their eradication. In this post I consider the matter of how transmutation of this substance helps with the opening up of connection with other worlds.

The sexual substance is what is called in Beelzebub’s Tales with the name of being-Exioёhary. It is, according with the book, the greatest gift given by our Common Mother to man. For those who have read In Search of the Miraculous, the sexual substance is called H12. This substance, according to that book, impregnates the entire organism of man. This is how it can be misused and abused by the other three lower centers (moving, feeling, and thinking). My own finding is that this is also how this substance gave birth in me to my depression, manic states, and psychosis.

But how to transmute this being-Exioёhary or H12?

The answer to this question, as all the possible answers to our own questions, is to be found in Beelzebub’s Tales, even to the point of how to make an omelet. In this respect I now quote from the book:

“And so, my boy, this totality of their first being-food which results from the evolution in these beings-apparatuses, corresponds with its vibrations to the last Stopinder of the being-Heptaparaparshinokh, and according to the particularity of this Stopinder, it enters the ‘higher-intentionally-actualizing-Mdnel-In’ of the law of Heptaparaparshinokh; and in order to transform completedly into new higher substances and in order to acquire vibrations corresponding to the vibrations of the next higher vivifyingness, namely, corresponding to the fifth Stopinder of the fundamental process of the common-cosmic Sacred Heptaparaparshinokh, it inevitably requires just that foreign help which is actualized only in the presences of the three-brained beings exclusively owing to those factors mentioned by me more than once and which are manifested in the ‘being-Partkdolg-duty,’ that is owing to just those factors which our COMMON FATHER CREATOR ENDLESSNESS consented to foreordain to be the means by which certain of the Tetartocosmoses – as a final result of their serving the purposes of the common-cosmic Iraniranumange – might become helpers in the ruling of the enlarged World and which factors also until now serve as the sole possible means for the assimilation of the cosmic substances required for the coating and perfecting of the higher being-bodies and which we at the present time call ‘conscious labors’ and ‘intentional suffering.’”

In fact if we continue quoting from the book we can clearly see how a misuse or involution of this substance gives rise to innumerable “illnesses.”

Just this same totality of substances which inevitably always arises as the final sum in the presences of all beings from their first being-food, became one of the chief causes of the fact that later, when they ceased to actualize ‘being-Partkdolg-duty’ in their common presences, and this totality of cosmic substances in consequence did not receive, according to the Sacred Heptaparaparshinokh, the required foreign help for their completing evolution into other definite higher active elements, it began to involve back in them towards those crystallizations from which their evolution began. And such involutionary processes in them began from this time to serve their common presences as factors which began to engender in their common presences the data for the arising of their innumerable what they call ‘illnesses,’ and thus on the one hand began to ‘de-perfect’ their previously established essence-individuality, and on the other hand to shorten the general duration of their existences.”

It is quite obvious from the quote above that transmutation of the sexual substance which is the result of the transformation of the first being-food, demands serious practice of “conscious labors” and “intentional suffering.” The only problem is that these two being-Partkdolg-duty are not specifically spelled out in the book, except only to say that the best form of “intentional suffering” is to bear the unpleasant manifestation of other beings during one’s shared existence with them.

What to do then? It is quite obvious that the thing to do is to find by oneself what “conscious Labors” and “intentional suffering” are. This has to be done according to one’s individuality and what is good for some people may not be good for another. I have worked on this matter for several years and have found my own “conscious labors” and “intentional suffering” according to my own individuality. It is this way that I have been able to eradicate from my common presence the evils of my bipolarity and psychosis to the point that I no longer need medication. Amazing but true.

Transmutation of the sexual substance enables us to connect with other worlds, as well as allowing us to have direct connection with other people. This connectivity cannot and is not proper to the three lower three centers. We can see the world and other’s worlds directly, without the filters introduced by the functionality of the lower three centers. Hence the importance of transmutation of the sexual substance.

For many centuries, monks of every age have engaged in the practice of sexual abstinence as way of transmutation of the sexual substance. However, as it is clearly stated in the book, abstinence does not work:

“At the present time, very many of these ‘monasteries’ exist there, and these innumerable ‘monks’ who enter them do indeed strictly abstain from the ejection from themselves in the customary way of the being-Exioëhary or sperm formed in them; but of course, no sensible result at all is ever obtained from this abstinence of theirs, and it is not obtained, because the thought has ceased even to enter the heads of these unfortunate ‘contemporary’ monks that although it is indeed possible, by means of these substances Exioëry formed in them, to perfect themselves, yet this can proceed exclusively only if the second and third being-foods are intentionally absorbed and consciously digested in one’s presence, and this is possible exclusively only if all the parts of one’s presence have been accustomed beforehand consciously to fulfill both sacred being-Partkdolg-duties, that is to fulfill ‘conscious labors’ and ‘intentional sufferings.’”

Two serious effects of this abstinence are also mentioned in the book:

“The first kind of action of this definite substance consists in this, that it promotes the depositing of superfluous what is called ‘Karatsiag,’ or, as they call it there, ‘fat.’ And its second kind of action promotes the arising and the dispersing over the whole planetary body of what are called ‘Poisonioonoskirian-vibrations.’

“The consequence of all this is that in the first case these terrestrial abstaining monks become extraordinarily, as it is usually said there, fat, and sometimes one indeed meets among these fat monks specimens with such an abundant deposit of fat, that they could give many points to that form of being there which they expressly fatten in order to increase this same fat in their planetary bodies, and this form of being they call there ‘pig.’

“And in the second case, on the contrary, these abstaining monks become, as it is also usually said there, ‘meager-thin’; and the action of the ‘Poisonioonoskirian-vibrations’ which penetrate through them is chiefly evident in their general psyche which becomes sharply dual and the manifestations of which are divided into two diametrically opposite kinds – the outer, visible and for show, sensed by everyone around them, and the inner and hidden, which the ordinary beings there, especially the contemporary, are entirely incapable of ascertaining or perceiving – namely, in their outer visible manifestations, these ‘Poisonioonoskirian-monks’ appear to be what your favorites would express as ‘bigots’ of a high degree; and in their hidden inner manifestations, not shown to others, what your favorites would call ‘expert cynics,’ also of a high degree.”

I was able to verify these two facts during a four year stay at a Chan (Zen) meditation center. The fat monks all they cared about was to end the satsang so they could go to the basement to have a drink and a piece of cake. The thin monks were indeed expert cynics.


Will Mesa


About willmesa

I have been studying and working with the ideas of G.I. Gurdjieff exposed in his Opus Magnum Beelzebub’s Tales to His Grandson. The intention of this blog is to share these ideas with people around the world. For more information about me, please search in Google for Will Mesa
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Transmutation of the Sexual Substance.

  1. Gregory says:

    Will said:
    “I was able to verify these two facts during a four year stay at a Chan (Zen) meditation center. The fat monks all they cared about was to end the satsang so they could go to the basement to have a drink and a piece of cake. The thin monks were indeed expert cynics.”

    And if I go out into everyday life and hob nob and engage in as many ordinary life situations that I can — with the proper-to-my-aim(s) psychological stance, of course —- I will undoubtedly run up against many of these two types of “monks” embodied in either gender.


    • willmesa says:

      Since life too is a large monastery where many people practice abstinence, we should expect to find there both the fat monk and the skinny monk, the liar and the cynic, respectively.

  2. Mike (the mammal) says:

    During one of my experimental elucidations that are still very experimental so that i am not suggesting anyone should do the same, or try it at home, or themselves question the newly arisen ‘climate science’, but in this case more recently in part due to this blog, i was specifically trying to reconcile questions of my own about possibility of CO2-abstaining-monks.

    I did try to post my third attempt after starting somewhat again over the last two days that consisted of starting again with respect to this question more than twice, and will try again shortly in what i had to say about this question of ‘monks’, and even what it might mean with respect to the sciences that in some cases attract adherents that might be similar to the idea of a monk of some description according to how the word is used in BTTHG.

    I think what i did was to earlier delete cookies in my browser, and so when the cookies refreshed after my attempt at posting, the text disappeared. In any case the cat is out of the bag with respect to possible evidence that CO2 abstaining monks’ possibly do exist. I also look at the same question of abstinence with respect to what are called ‘vegetarians’ and now while i think of it, an association i am reminded about in BTTHG right now concerning the abstaining from meat as well.

    It did seem to make sense to me with respect to BTTHG. It is probably a good thing that the previous post failed in this case for now. I will endeavor to make the new edit as short and succinct as possible. I suppose this is an ellucidation that might not be as straight forward as it first appeared to me so it is good that it will give me more time to digest my new impressions on the matter as they are at the moment still like splashes of insight without enough resolution.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s